{"id":544906,"date":"2026-08-27T03:08:48","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T01:08:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/uncategorized\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T03:08:48","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T01:08:48","slug":"2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","title":{"rendered":"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans"},"content":{"rendered":"

The DGAL’s 2018 monitoring and control plans review<\/a> was published on 24 October 2019.<\/p>\n

As a reminder, monitoring plans (PS) aim to estimate the overall level of contamination of the monitored production through random sampling, while control plans (PC) aim to target foodstuffs presenting an increased risk of contamination.<\/p>\n

In 2018, 60,661<\/strong> samples were taken, including 59,603 sampled within national territory and 1,058 sampled at import.<\/p>\n

Below are the contaminants tested for:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Contaminant family<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analytes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Growth promoters<\/td>\nStilbenes, steroids, thyreostatics, beta-agonists<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Biological contaminants<\/td>\nEscherichia coli including Shiga toxin-producing strains (STEC), Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter, Salmonella spp, histamine<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Trace metal elements<\/td>\nLead, cadmium, mercury<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Veterinary medicines<\/td>\nNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, antibiotics, anticoccidials, tranquillisers, anthelmintics, carbamates, pyrethroids<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mycotoxins<\/td>\nAflatoxin B1, aflatoxin M1, ochratoxin, zearalenone, trichothecenes A and B, fumonisins B1 and B2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phycotoxins<\/td>\nASP toxins, lipophilic toxins, PSP toxins<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Persistent organic pollutants<\/td>\nPCBs, dioxins, PAHs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plant protection products<\/td>\nApproximately 600 active substances including banned active substances as well as chlordecone<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Radionuclides<\/td>\nCaesium 134 and 137 and other radionuclides<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Banned substances<\/td>\nNitrites, melamine, processed animal proteins (banned), chloramphenicol, nitroimidazoles, nitrofurans, fluorine, colourings, ragweed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

PLANT PRIMARY PRODUCTION<\/strong>
\n2018 REVIEW OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCT RESIDUE CONTROLS IN PLANT PRIMARY PRODUCTION
\n<\/strong>1,148 <\/strong>samples were analysed, including 306<\/strong> under the monitoring plan and 842<\/strong> under the control plan.<\/p>\n

Monitoring plan<\/u>: The non-compliance rate is 8.5%<\/strong>, lower than in 2017 (13.6%) but higher than in 2016 (5.81%).<\/p>\n

    \n
  • 7.7%<\/strong> of non-compliances relate to MRL non-compliance of active substances not authorised for that use,<\/li>\n
  • 7.7%<\/strong> of non-compliances relate to the presence of active substances authorised on the crop, at levels above the MRLs,<\/li>\n
  • 38.5%<\/strong> of non-compliances relate to the presence of active substances not authorised for marketing for use on the crop, with levels compliant with the MRLs,<\/li>\n
  • 46.1%<\/strong> of non-compliant cases are due to probable environmental pollution.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Flonicamid, prosulfocarb and dieldrin<\/strong> are the most frequently detected active substances.<\/p>\n

    The matrices with the highest non-compliance rate are edible-skin cucurbits, aubergines, okra, peppers\/chillies and watercress<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    Four substance residues probably originating from environmental pollution were identified: dieldrin, heptachlor, DDT and prosulfocarb<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    Control plan<\/u>: The non-compliance rate is 4.4%<\/strong>, higher than in 2017 (3.8%) but lower than in 2016 (7.2%).<\/p>\n

    56.8%<\/strong> of non-compliances relate to the presence of active substances not authorised for marketing for use on the crop, at levels below the MRLs.<\/p>\n

    43.2%<\/strong> of non-compliances relate to MRL non-compliance of active substances, whether authorised or not for that use, including 2 cases of probable environmental pollution (prosulfocarb).<\/p>\n

    The matrices with the highest detection rate of at least one residue, regardless of compliance status, are stone fruit, pome fruit and leafy vegetables<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    Boscalid<\/strong> is the most frequently detected substance, followed by pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, fludioxonil and cyprodinil. Linuron was detected in 19 samples. In the 5 non-compliance cases linked to this substance, application had been carried out after the grace period ending 3 June 2018 on celery stalks, celeriac and carrot.<\/p>\n

    The matrix with the most non-compliances, excluding environmental pollution, is celery<\/strong>. Active substances detected: linuron, iprodione, propamocarb, chlorantraniliprole, spinosad, dimethomorph, aclonifen, fluopicolide.<\/p>\n

    Three substance residues probably originating from environmental pollution were identified in 11 samples: dieldrin, oxadixyl and prosulfocarb<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    In summary, non-compliances are mainly explained by:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Use of plant protection products withdrawn from the market after the grace period allowed for using up stocks, such as linuron-based products;<\/li>\n
    • Poor agricultural practices, such as failure to comply with maximum authorised doses and\/or pre-harvest intervals, use of products not authorised on the crop, insufficient rinsing of the sprayer between two treatments;<\/li>\n
    • Possible contamination from neighbouring plots via aerial drift (case of prosulfocarb) or soil persistence (case of dieldrin, oxadixyl), leading to MRL exceedance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      PRODUCTS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN:<\/strong>
      \n2018 REVIEW OF CONTROLS ON BANNED SUBSTANCE RESIDUES, VETERINARY MEDICINES AND PESTICIDES IN ANIMALS AND PRODUCTS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Sectors<\/strong><\/td>\nEquine<\/strong><\/td>\nPoultry<\/strong><\/td>\nRabbit<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n0.10%<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Detail<\/strong><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2.02% for stilbenes, steroids and resorcylic acids<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n
      \n

      Sectors<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

      		\n

      Bovine<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

      		\n

      Porcine<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

      		\n

      Sheep and goat<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

      Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td>\n0.16%<\/td>\n0.05%<\/td>\n1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Detail<\/strong><\/td>\n1.32% antibiotics (chemical method)
      \n0.60% tetracyclines
      \n0.35% benzimidazoles and other anthelmintics
      \n0.20% antibiotics (microbiological method)
      \n0.21% glucocorticoids
      \n0.19% NSAIDs
      \n0.17% thyreostatics<\/td>\n      		2.50% steroid esters
      \n1.32% nitrofurans
      \n1.02% benzimidazoles and other anthelmintics
      \n0.20% nitroimidazoles
      \n0.13% antibiotics<\/td>\n      		11.30% stilbenes, steroids and resorcylic acids
      \n0.70% antibiotics
      \n0.67% benzimidazoles and other anthelmintics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Sectors<\/strong><\/td>\nFarmed game<\/strong><\/td>\nAquaculture<\/strong><\/td>\nMilk<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n1.12%<\/td>\n0.08% cow’s milk
      \n0% goat’s milk<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Detail<\/strong><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2.36% for antibiotics
      \n2.63% for colourings<\/td>\n      		0.09% antibiotics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Sectors<\/strong><\/td>\nEggs<\/strong><\/td>\nHoney<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td>\n0.27% hen eggs
      \n2.78% quail eggs<\/td>\n      		0.75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Detail<\/strong><\/td>\nHen eggs:
      \n0.50% sulfonamides
      \n0.40% anticoccidials
      \nQuail eggs:
      \n3.70% sulfonamides
      \n3.70% anticoccidials<\/td>\n      		1.02% antibiotics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING AND CONTROL OF PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (DIOXINS, PCBs, PAHs) IN FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      \n

      Control plan in animal primary production (including aquaculture)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

      Contaminant family<\/td>\nNumber of non-compliant samples<\/td>\nMatrices concerned<\/td>\nNon-compliance rate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Dioxins and DL-PCBs<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nGame meat
      \nSheep\/goat fat<\/td>\n      		0.075%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      NDL-PCBs<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nPoultry meat<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      \n

      Monitoring plan in animal primary production (including aquaculture)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

      Contaminant family<\/td>\nNumber of non-compliant samples<\/td>\nMatrices concerned<\/td>\nNon-compliance rate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Dioxins and DL-PCBs<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nWild freshwater fish (eel)<\/td>\n0.21%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      NDL-PCBs<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nWild freshwater fish (eel)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      PAHs<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING AND CONTROL OF TRACE METAL ELEMENTS IN FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN<\/strong>
      \nThe control plan<\/u> identified 8 non-compliant samples, across all sectors excluding equine and game, with regard to regulatory maximum levels, i.e. a non-compliance rate of 0.4%<\/strong>.
      \nFor the equine<\/strong> sector, the non-compliance rate is 1.53% in muscle and 65.2% in liver<\/strong>.
      \nFor game<\/strong>, the non-compliance rate is 8.3% in liver<\/strong>.
      \nThe monitoring plan<\/u> for fishery products detected a non-compliance rate of 3.7%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF RADIONUCLIDE MONITORING IN ANIMAL FOODSTUFFS AND FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN<\/strong>
      \nAs in previous years, this monitoring plan shows low levels of radiological activity<\/strong> in foodstuffs in France. Wild animals more heavily contaminated in certain areas affected by fallout from the Chernobyl accident (mainly in eastern France, the southern Alps and as far as Corsica) nevertheless remain well below the maximum levels set for international trade and in the event of a nuclear accident.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING AND CONTROL OF CHLORDECONE IN PLANT FOODSTUFFS INTENDED FOR HUMAN OR ANIMAL CONSUMPTION AND IN ANIMAL FOODSTUFFS INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION IN MARTINIQUE AND GUADELOUPE FOR 2018<\/strong>
      \nThe matrices bovine (perirenal fat and liver), porcine (perirenal fat), eggs, crustaceans (spiny lobster), courgette and spring onion<\/strong> are those for which chlordecone<\/u> levels are most frequently above the limit of quantification.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING OF LIVE BIVALVE MOLLUSC CONTAMINATION BY PHYCOTOXINS AT THE DISTRIBUTION STAGE<\/strong>
      \nThe contamination rate of bivalve molluscs by phycotoxins<\/u> is very low, with an overall non-compliance rate of 0.15%<\/strong>. The only non-compliance detected concerns shellfish<\/strong> from Spain.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING OF MACKEREL AND TUNA CONTAMINATION BY HISTAMINE AT THE DISTRIBUTION STAGE<\/strong>
      \nThe non-compliance rate is estimated at 2.14% for mackerel and 1.93% for tuna<\/strong>.
      \nIn 2019, the monitoring plan will target sardines, sprats and herring as well as chilled tuna.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING OF MINCED BEEF CONTAMINATION BY SHIGA TOXIN-PRODUCING ESCHERICHIA COLI<\/em> (STEC) AT THE DISTRIBUTION STAGE<\/strong>
      \n3 STEC<\/u> strains considered highly pathogenic (two O26:H11 and one O145:H25<\/strong>) were isolated in 3 samples of minced beef<\/strong>. The contamination rate is 0.5%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING OF FRESH POULTRY MEAT CONTAMINATION BY SALMONELLA SPP.<\/em> AT THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE STAGE<\/strong>
      \nThe total contamination rate of fresh poultry meat at the slaughterhouse by Salmonella spp<\/u><\/em> is 15.8%<\/strong> and appears higher in the “fattening turkey” sector than in the “broiler chicken” sector.
      \nRegarding the two serotypes<\/u> subject to a regulatory criterion (Typhimurium and Enteritidis<\/u>), the total non-compliance rate is 1.54%<\/strong> and appears higher in the “broiler chicken” sector than in the “fattening turkey” sector.<\/p>\n

      REVIEW OF MONITORING OF RAW MILK CHEESE CONTAMINATION BY LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES<\/em>, BY SALMONELLA SPP.<\/em> AND BY ESCHERICHIA COLI<\/em> STEC AT THE PRODUCTION STAGE<\/strong>
      \nThe contamination rate of raw milk cheeses<\/strong>, excluding hard cooked-pressed cheeses, by L. monocytogenes<\/u><\/em> is estimated at 0.65%<\/strong>.
      \nThe contamination rate of raw milk cheeses<\/strong>, excluding hard cooked-pressed cheeses, by Salmonella<\/u><\/em> is estimated at 0.65%<\/strong>.
      \nThe contamination rate of raw milk cheeses<\/strong>, excluding hard cooked-pressed cheeses, by STEC<\/u> is estimated at 0.8%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

      ANIMAL FEED<\/strong>
      \nThe overall non-compliance rate is 0.23%<\/strong> for the samples taken.<\/p>\n

      All this generated data (analytical results and associated metadata), regardless of the sample’s compliance result, is transmitted to risk assessment agencies (national (ANSES) and European (EFSA)) to estimate consumer exposure to the various hazards, in order to support public authorities and industry sectors in implementing management measures and\/or preventive actions to control contamination.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      The DGAL’s 2018 monitoring and control plans review was published on 24 October 2019. As…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":14241,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[181],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-544906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regulatory-watch"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The DGAL’s 2018 monitoring and control plans review was published on 24 October 2019. As…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Phytocontrol\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/laboratoirePHYTOCONTROL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-27T01:08:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Matrices-diverses.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"L\u00e9a\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"L\u00e9a\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"L\u00e9a\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b6615d9f6255172ec54877731e3b62a5\"},\"headline\":\"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-27T01:08:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1309,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/Matrices-diverses.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Regulatory watch\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\",\"name\":\"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/Matrices-diverses.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-27T01:08:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b6615d9f6255172ec54877731e3b62a5\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/Matrices-diverses.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/Matrices-diverses.png\",\"width\":700,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"Matrices diverses\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Phytocontrol\",\"description\":\"Laboratoire d'analyses\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b6615d9f6255172ec54877731e3b62a5\",\"name\":\"L\u00e9a\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/596dd8ddc5587d4fa6d385b3be7df83487233933b2a48701410e4262697bd00a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/596dd8ddc5587d4fa6d385b3be7df83487233933b2a48701410e4262697bd00a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/596dd8ddc5587d4fa6d385b3be7df83487233933b2a48701410e4262697bd00a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"L\u00e9a\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans","og_description":"The DGAL’s 2018 monitoring and control plans review was published on 24 October 2019. As…","og_url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","og_site_name":"Phytocontrol","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/laboratoirePHYTOCONTROL","article_published_time":"2026-08-27T01:08:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":700,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Matrices-diverses.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"L\u00e9a","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"L\u00e9a","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"},"author":{"name":"L\u00e9a","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b6615d9f6255172ec54877731e3b62a5"},"headline":"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans","datePublished":"2026-08-27T01:08:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"},"wordCount":1309,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Matrices-diverses.png","articleSection":["Regulatory watch"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","name":"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Matrices-diverses.png","datePublished":"2026-08-27T01:08:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b6615d9f6255172ec54877731e3b62a5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Matrices-diverses.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Matrices-diverses.png","width":700,"height":400,"caption":"Matrices diverses"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/2018-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2018 DGAL monitoring and control plans"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/","name":"Phytocontrol","description":"Laboratoire d'analyses","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b6615d9f6255172ec54877731e3b62a5","name":"L\u00e9a","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/596dd8ddc5587d4fa6d385b3be7df83487233933b2a48701410e4262697bd00a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/596dd8ddc5587d4fa6d385b3be7df83487233933b2a48701410e4262697bd00a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/596dd8ddc5587d4fa6d385b3be7df83487233933b2a48701410e4262697bd00a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"L\u00e9a"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=544906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544906\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14241"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=544906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=544906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=544906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}