{"id":544554,"date":"2026-08-27T02:04:39","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T00:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/uncategorized\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"},"modified":"2026-09-19T22:30:35","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T20:30:35","slug":"review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","title":{"rendered":"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"\/app\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Bilan-2020.pdf\">review of the DGAL monitoring and control plans for 2020<\/a> has just been published.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As a reminder, monitoring plans (PS) aim to estimate the overall level of contamination of the production monitored through random sampling, while control plans (PC) aim to target foodstuffs presenting an increased risk of contamination.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2020, 16 plans were implemented and <strong>58,031<\/strong> samples were taken:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>57,360 products sampled on national territory and 671 sampled at import.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>46,216 products sampled for control plans, 11,144 products sampled for monitoring plans.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The contaminants investigated are listed below:<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Contaminant family<\/strong><\/td><td><strong> Analytes<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Veterinary drugs<\/td><td>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST), antibiotics, anticoccidials, tranquillisers, anthelmintics<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Growth promoters<\/td><td>Stilbenes, steroids, resorcylic acid lactones, thyreostats, beta-agonists<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Prohibited\/undesirable substances<\/td><td>Nitrites, melamine, animal-derived constituents (prohibited), chloramphenicol, nitroimidazoles, nitrofurans, fluorine, colourings, ragweed, botanical impurities<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Pesticides in animal production<\/td><td>Organophosphates, organochlorines, pyrethroids, carbamates, glyphosate, fipronil<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Plant protection products<\/td><td>Between 500 and 660 active substances including prohibited active substances such as chlordecone<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Persistent organic pollutants<\/td><td>PCBs, dioxins, PAHs<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Trace metal elements<\/td><td>Lead, cadmium, mercury<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Radionuclides<\/td><td>Caesium 134 and 137<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Mycotoxins<\/td><td>Aflatoxin B1, ergot, ochratoxin, zearalenone, trichothecenes A and B including T2-HT2 and deoxynivalenol, fumonisins B1 and B2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Phycotoxins<\/td><td>ASP toxins, lipophilic toxins, PSP toxins<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Biological contaminants<\/td><td>Histamine, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Antimicrobial resistance<\/td><td>Commensal indicator Escherichia coli (E. coli) and E. coli producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), cephalosporinase (AmpC) or carbapenemase (Carba), Salmonella spp.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#005f9f\" class=\"has-inline-color\"><strong>MONITORING OF PRIMARY PLANT PRODUCTION:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCT RESIDUE CONTROLS IN PRIMARY PLANT PRODUCTION<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>868<\/strong> samples were taken, including <strong>210<\/strong> under the monitoring plan and <strong>658<\/strong> under the control plan.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Monitoring plan: the non-compliance rate is <strong>16.7%<\/strong>, higher than in previous years (11.7% in 2019).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The overall compliance of the results is broken down as follows:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliant samples: <strong>83%<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>75% compliant samples.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>8% compliant samples with probable environmental pollution alone<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Non-compliant samples: <strong>17%<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>8% non-compliant with MRL exceedance and detection of substance(s) not authorised for the use<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>9% non-compliant with detection of substance(s) not authorised for the use.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Fosetyl-aluminium, dithiocarbamates, prosulfocarb, fludioxonil and pendimethalin<\/strong> are the most frequently detected active substances.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The matrices with the most MRL exceedances, excluding environmental pollution, are <strong>beetroot, watercress, lettuce and hazelnuts.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Three substance residues likely originating from environmental pollution were identified: <strong>pendimethalin, DDT and prosulfocarb<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Control plan: the non-compliance rate is <strong>8.2%<\/strong>, higher than in previous years (6.8% in 2018).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The overall compliance of the results is broken down as follows:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliant samples: <strong>91.8%<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>90.9% compliant samples.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>0.9% compliant samples with probable environmental pollution alone<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Non-compliant samples: <strong>8.2%<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>0.5% non-compliant with MRL exceedance<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>0.9% non-compliant with MRL exceedance and detection of substance(s) not authorised for the use<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>6.8% non-compliant with detection of substance(s) not authorised for the use.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The matrices with the highest detection rate of at least one residue, regardless of compliance status, are <strong>strawberries, wheat, fresh herbs (chives, coriander, mint and parsley), nectarines and peaches, cherries, lamb&#8217;s lettuce and escarole, carrots, radishes, courgettes, melon and fodder beet.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Boscalid<\/strong> is the most detected substance, followed by <strong>flonicamid, dithiocarbamates, fluopyram and fludioxonil.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The matrices with the most MRL exceedances, excluding environmental pollution, are <strong>coriander, wheat, rapeseed, beans (shelled and unshelled), maize, peppers and tomatoes.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Substance residues likely originating from environmental pollution were identified in 9 samples. These were <strong>prosulfocarb, dieldrin and quintozene.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In summary, non-compliances can be explained in particular by:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The use of plant protection products withdrawn from the market after the grace period allowed for using up stocks, such as products based on linuron, acetamiprid and chlorpropham;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Poor agricultural practices, such as failure to comply with maximum authorised doses and\/or pre-harvest intervals, use of unauthorised products on the crop, insufficient rinsing of the sprayer between two treatments;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The possibility of neighbouring contamination through aerial drift (in the case of prosulfocarb) or persistence in soil (in the case of dieldrin and quintozene).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#005f9f\" class=\"has-inline-color\"><strong>MONITORING OF PRIMARY ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF RESIDUE CONTROLS FOR PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES, VETERINARY DRUGS AND PESTICIDES IN ANIMALS AND FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN:<\/span><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sectors<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Cattle<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Pig<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Sheep and Goat<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td><td>0,12%<\/td><td>0,09%<\/td><td>0,83%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Detail<\/strong><\/td><td>1% antibiotics (chemical method)<br\/>0.21% tetracyclines<br\/>0.35% glucocorticoids<br\/>0.24% NSAIDs<\/td><td>0.36% stilbenes, steroids, resorcylic acid lactones<br\/>0.32% antibiotics (chemical method)<br\/>0.20% antibiotics (microbiological method)<br\/>0.31% sulphonamides<br\/>0.15% benzimidazoles and other anthelmintics<\/td><td>10.46% stilbenes, steroids and resorcylic acid lactones<br\/>0.56% antibiotics (chemical method)<br\/>0.48% benzimidazoles and other anthelmintics<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sectors<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Horse<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Poultry<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Rabbit<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td><td>0,80%<\/td><td>0,15%<\/td><td>2,45%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Detail<\/strong><\/td><td>2.94% stilbenes, steroids, resorcylic acid lactones<br\/>2.5% NSAIDs<\/td><td>2.44% stilbenes, steroids and resorcylic acid lactones<\/td><td>5.33% antibiotics (chemical method)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sectors<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Farmed game<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Aquaculture<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Milk<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Total non-compliance rate<\/strong><\/td><td>0%<\/td><td>0,51%<\/td><td>0,77%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Detail<\/strong><\/td><td>&#8211;<\/td><td>1.52% antibiotics (chemical method)<\/td><td>0.19% antibiotics (microbiological method), benzimidazoles and NSAIDs<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF MONITORING AND CONTROL OF PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (DIOXINS, PCBs, PAHs) IN FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN:<\/span><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Control plan in primary animal production (including aquaculture)<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Contaminant family<\/td><td>Number of non-compliant samples<\/td><td>Matrices concerned<\/td><td>Non-compliance rate<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Dioxins and DL-PCBs<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>Pig fat<\/td><td><strong>0,06%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>NDL-PCBs<\/td><td>0<\/td><td>&#8211;<\/td><td><strong>0,0%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Monitoring plan for fishery products (excluding aquaculture)<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Contaminant family<\/td><td>Number of non-compliant samples<\/td><td>Matrices concerned<\/td><td>Non-compliance rate<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Dioxins and DL-PCBs<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>Freshwater fish<\/td><td><strong>0,2%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>NDL-PCBs<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>Freshwater fish<\/td><td><strong>0,2%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>PAHs<\/td><td>0<\/td><td>&#8211;<\/td><td><strong>0,0%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF MONITORING AND CONTROL OF TRACE METAL ELEMENTS IN FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The control plan identified 11 non-compliant samples, across all sectors excluding game, with respect to regulatory maximum levels, i.e. a non-compliance rate of <strong>0.63%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the <strong>horse<\/strong> sector, no non-compliance was identified.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For <strong>wild game<\/strong>, the non-compliance rate is <strong>15.79% in muscle and 1.75% in liver<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For <strong>farmed game<\/strong>, 1 muscle sample and 1 liver sample showed contamination out of the 11 samples analysed.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The fishery products monitoring plan detected 11 non-compliant samples, i.e. a non-compliance rate of <strong>2.3%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF RADIONUCLIDE MONITORING IN ANIMAL FEED AND FOODSTUFFS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As in previous years, this monitoring plan shows <strong>low levels of radiological activity<\/strong> in foodstuffs in France. Wild animals more heavily contaminated in certain areas affected by fallout from the Chernobyl accident (mainly in eastern France, the southern Alps and Corsica) nevertheless remain well below the maximum levels set for international trade and in the event of a nuclear accident.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">REVIEW OF THE CONTROL AND MONITORING OF CHLORDECONE IN PLANT FOODSTUFFS INTENDED FOR HUMAN OR ANIMAL CONSUMPTION AND IN ANIMAL FOODSTUFFS INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION IN MARTINIQUE AND GUADELOUPE<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The matrices <strong>cattle (perirenal fat), goat (perirenal fat), eggs, and one farmed fish<\/strong> are those for which chlordecone levels most frequently exceed the limit of quantification. 5 non-compliances were recorded in plant foodstuffs in Martinique.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF MONITORING OF CONTAMINATION OF THE ENGRAULIDAE FAMILY, FISH OF OTHER FAMILIES PRESENTING A HISTAMINE RISK, AND TUNA, BY HISTAMINE AT THE DISTRIBUTION STAGE.<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The non-compliance rate is estimated at <strong>0.30% for the Engraulidae family (anchovies) and fish of other families presenting a histamine risk, and 1.8% for tuna<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2021, the monitoring plan targets tuna as well as fish of other families presenting a histamine risk.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#ed910d\" class=\"has-inline-color\">REVIEW OF MONITORING OF CONTAMINATION OF SMOKED FISHERY PRODUCTS AND COOKED CRUSTACEANS BY <em>LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES<\/em> AT THE DISTRIBUTION STAGE.<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Of the 427 samples of smoked fishery products and cooked crustaceans taken, 6 smoked salmon samples were contaminated with L. monocytogenes:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>1 smoked salmon from Norway showed contamination above 100 CFU\/g. This strain was shared with the CNR.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>5 smoked salmon samples from Norway and Scotland showed contamination below 100 CFU\/g. These strains were recorded at the CNR.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the 2020 monitoring plan, the contamination rate of smoked fishery products and cooked crustaceans by L. monocytogenes is estimated at <strong>1.4%.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"color:#005f9f\" class=\"has-inline-color\"><strong>MONITORING OF ANIMAL FEED:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The overall non-compliance rate for samples taken is <strong>0.24%<\/strong>, relating to the detection of PAP (Processed Animal Protein) in compound feed for fish (1 sample), Salmonella in compound feed for poultry and compound pet food (chew items), and poultry PAP (3 samples).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All this data generated (analytical results and associated metadata), regardless of the sample&#8217;s compliance result, is sent to the national (ANSES) and European (EFSA) risk assessment agencies to estimate consumer exposure to the various hazards, with a view to supporting public authorities and industry sectors in implementing management measures and\/or preventive actions to control contamination.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Need technical, regulatory or pricing information? Our customer service is available from 8am to 8pm, Monday to Friday, at <a href=\"tel:+33800900775\">+33 800 900 775<\/a> or <a href=\"mailto:service-clients@phytocontrol.com\">service-clients@phytocontrol.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To keep up to date with all the latest Phytocontrol news, follow us on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/9369065\/\">LinkedIn <\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/laboratoirePHYTOCONTROL\">Facebook <\/a>!<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The review of the DGAL monitoring and control plans for 2020 has just been published.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":18598,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[181],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-544554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regulatory-watch"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.4 (Yoast SEO v28.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The review of the DGAL monitoring and control plans for 2020 has just been published.&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Phytocontrol\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/laboratoirePHYTOCONTROL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-27T00:04:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-19T20:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Aliments-divers.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"thomas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"thomas\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"thomas\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cbb3504d6d9bee97d58305e50591a9cf\"},\"headline\":\"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-27T00:04:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-19T20:30:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1313,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/Aliments-divers.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Regulatory watch\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/Aliments-divers.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-27T00:04:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-19T20:30:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cbb3504d6d9bee97d58305e50591a9cf\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/Aliments-divers.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/app\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/Aliments-divers.png\",\"width\":700,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"Aliments divers\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/regulatory-watch\\\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Phytocontrol\",\"description\":\"Laboratoire d&#039;analyses\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.phytocontrol.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cbb3504d6d9bee97d58305e50591a9cf\",\"name\":\"thomas\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9972782e2cc5c3e097e9288332becc2979b1dd288c50e6d06b954f4edda1e4ca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9972782e2cc5c3e097e9288332becc2979b1dd288c50e6d06b954f4edda1e4ca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9972782e2cc5c3e097e9288332becc2979b1dd288c50e6d06b954f4edda1e4ca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"thomas\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans","og_description":"The review of the DGAL monitoring and control plans for 2020 has just been published.&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","og_site_name":"Phytocontrol","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/laboratoirePHYTOCONTROL","article_published_time":"2026-08-27T00:04:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-19T20:30:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":700,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Aliments-divers.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"thomas","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"thomas","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"},"author":{"name":"thomas","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/cbb3504d6d9bee97d58305e50591a9cf"},"headline":"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans","datePublished":"2026-08-27T00:04:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-19T20:30:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"},"wordCount":1313,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Aliments-divers.png","articleSection":["Regulatory watch"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/","name":"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans - Phytocontrol","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Aliments-divers.png","datePublished":"2026-08-27T00:04:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-19T20:30:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/cbb3504d6d9bee97d58305e50591a9cf"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Aliments-divers.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/app\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Aliments-divers.png","width":700,"height":400,"caption":"Aliments divers"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/review-of-the-2020-dgal-monitoring-and-control-plans\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Review of the 2020 DGAL monitoring and control plans"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/","name":"Phytocontrol","description":"Laboratoire d&#039;analyses","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/cbb3504d6d9bee97d58305e50591a9cf","name":"thomas","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9972782e2cc5c3e097e9288332becc2979b1dd288c50e6d06b954f4edda1e4ca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9972782e2cc5c3e097e9288332becc2979b1dd288c50e6d06b954f4edda1e4ca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9972782e2cc5c3e097e9288332becc2979b1dd288c50e6d06b954f4edda1e4ca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"thomas"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=544554"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544554\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":552309,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544554\/revisions\/552309"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=544554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=544554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=544554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}